Section 13 and 15 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Petition was accepted by the rent controller on a statement regarding the consent of the tenant's interlocutor. The application was filed under section 12 (2), after the death of the challenged injunction order, which was dismissed by the controller of rent and interfered with by the appellate court, its legal heirs. 2) In filing a new application under, the rent controller of CPC said that the application was being barred by the excluded law on the basis that in the case of the same article, against the same order, The application was eventually dismissed and the proceedings were finalized by the Appellate Court, however, the plea was accepted on the ground that the petitioner The decision was made without rent control. Compiling the parties' matters and recording the record and obtaining the case remand or dismissing the application filed under Section 12 (2), CPC, essentially removing the valid order, which is the first to be finalized. After it was approved, it could no longer be reopened in the interests of the defendants in the interest of interfering with the removal of the application previously filed under section 12 (2). , The CPC, and its retention by the interlocutor, was properly decided by the Rent Controller and consequently the exclusion against which the revision request was filed, which was dismissed. It was reported that the court-approved orders in the first round of litigation were final. Interrupter and interests all the time
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
