Section 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), OI, R 10 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal The applicants' parties for nomination were rejected for their application, as the trial court applied for restitution of the parties. 'S request was dismissed for illegal prosecution. The request was also dismissed after which he reviewed the same fate. The applicant claimed that his application was dismissed as a result of an incorrect notice of the date of his application. When the trial was adjourned, the applicant accepted a number of petitions to support his position. After the application was rejected, the applicant filed a revision, rather than filing an appeal, which was the appropriate remedy available to them. Appeal was a legal right that cannot be reconciled with the request for review. The amending court gave rise to the defect of the jurisdiction and decided to request the review without affirming the question of its retention. Applications that were not treatable in the constitutional petition were rejected in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
