SAFDAR ALI versus DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY THROUGH SECRETARY
Section 115 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 28 (2) of the High Court, within the limitation period, have been received by the applicant to remove the objections of the office within three days, but Re-filed after four months. In the wake of the delay in re-filing the revision in 1908, Val himself submitted a revision file on the matter, which was obliged to remove the objection within three days in compliance with the direction of the office, but he Failure to do so could not be extended to the applicant in section 5 of the Act, 1908, since the duration of the filing restriction was provided under section 115, the CPC petitioner having no reasonable cause for delay. Was submitted which the High Court rejected the amendment because of sanctions. By Range \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
