Appreciating the evidence of section 2 302 (b), the prosecution's witnesses supported the complainant's version, there is no contradiction between the evidence of all the witnesses regarding the date, time and manner of the incident, and the parties are good As is well known. Identifying the suspect at the scene of the incident by another, the complainant and the prosecution's witnesses cannot be doubted; the defense lawyer has failed to establish any illicit desire or hostility by the prosecution's witnesses. To prove that they have falsely deposed against the accused. Evidence of this was that the eyewitness testimony was affecting trust, which did not face any weakness Medical evidence fully confirmed the ocular testimony. Significant evidence also supported the prosecution's case that the victim had enmity with several persons. And that he could have been killed by either of them, to no avail, because there was general evidence from the prosecution's witnesses that in his view, the accused was abusing the accused with two fugitives. Was targeted and committed. The motive of the murder was proved by the evidence of the complainant and the prosecution witnesses, for whatever reason the statement of the complainant and the witnesses, who were eyewitnesses and their accused had no motive to falsely implicate the trial court. There was no reason to do so, the circumstances were truly punishable and the conviction of the trial court and reasonable and reasonable conclusions, no interference in the circumstances was required.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
