Find a Lawyer

MUREED HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) Definition of Evidence Qatiel Amtu, the evidence behind the incident was controversial The water circulation of the circulation was used to obtain water when irrigation water was taken to the ground, which The presence of the deceased indicates that the accused intended to divert irrigation water circulation tried to frustrate the complainant by advising that the complaining party as well as the accused had already rented their land. Provided that the accused did not propose the name of the accused or denied the evidence in support of the evidence of such a purpose which is a strong condition One of the evidence was that the trial court had thoroughly examined and discussed the evidence under the leadership of the prosecution and it had considered the facts as well as the legal aspects of the case and came to that conclusion. That the accused was the cause of the crime. The trial court's late murder was not misleading or vulnerable to any weakness due to misinterpretation of evidence or misinterpretation of evidence or scope of trial, the trial court's findings could not be interrupted, appeals were dismissed in the circumstances. Done

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015

• GUL MUHAMMAD v. State 2015 PCrLJ 1329
• CHIEF ENGINEER, BUILDING AND ROAD DEPARTMENT, QUETTA v. UMAR KHAN 2015 MLD 1332
• Mrs. BILQUIS MOHSIN BUTT v. MUHAMMAD MAHMOOD BUTT 2015 CLC 1333
• AUGERE PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Ministry of Finance 2015 PTD 1340
• HABIB BANK LIMITED v. NATIONAL FIBERS LIMITED 2015 CLD 1351
• MUHAMMAD RAZA QADRI v. ASIF IQBAL 2015 PCrLJ 1357
• SHAKEEL AIJAZ v. Mst. SHAKEELA NASEEM 2015 MLD 1360
• MUREED v. State 2015 YLR 1366

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2015 →

patent advocate from Hala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes