Section 2 302 (b) convictions of convicted AMD evidence, injury reduction on the left shoulder of the victim was specifically complained of and the prosecution's witnesses persisted and assigned the same character to the accused to the extent that the FIR The accused, the medical account was confirmed by medical evidence. And since the specific injury to the deceased was assigned to the accused and it was also on the body part of the deceased and the fire was very close, knowing full well that such a fire could cause the death of the deceased, I want to be involved. The incident was beyond any doubt that the suspect was armed with a 12-bore gun which was recovered from him, and the recovery of the pallets and wad underneath the wound also confirmed that the prosecution had taken into account The matter was described by an ocular account. There was no reason to differ from the trial court's findings regarding the culprits, the recovery and even the medical evidence, only one accused was charged on the fire that killed the victim and he The incident was not repeated. In such a case, the accused had some immunity and had submitted a sentence of reduction in his sentence, not the extreme death sentence of the accused. Demand was made and the lower sentence of life imprisonment would have fulfilled the end of justice. The convict's conviction was upheld, but his death sentence was converted to life imprisonment with the benefit of Section 382B, CRPC.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
