Definition of Section 302 (b) of the conviction was the only case in this case, and immediately after filing an FIR, all the details related to the incident were mentioned by both witnesses, although related to the deceased, but not for the accused. The lawyer was unable to do so. Identifying someone's personal enmity or hatred with my relationship with the witnesses' victim was not enough to refute their testimony, unless they had a close association with the accused, in which case the alternative Excluded any possibility which was an unusual occurrence in the case of any accused. Since it was not possible that witnesses could release the real culprit responsible for the two murders of their closest relatives and falsely implicate the accused in the case that the two accused had killed each other, it was only one There was a delusional and unfounded request. Both the father and son of the deceased were on his behalf and the accused failed to substantiate his plea during the trial, the ocular account was permanent, reliable and reliable in all material aspects of the incident. And this confirmed minor contradictions through medical evidence. The seat of some of the injured had no effect on the prosecution's case and was reinforced by a very strong purpose set in the FIR in the ocular account. Another case against the accused was his felony 25 days and he was able to explain it even during the trial. Following unsuccessful shot pistol recovered from the victim's body to the Forensic Science Laboratory of the account was negligence by the investigating officer as necessary, but such lapu
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
