Find a Lawyer

BATA PAKISTAN LIMITED versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Sections 15 (a), 19 and 22 In order to defend the expiration of the written tenancy term, the tenant (a public limited company) requests for the lease of the tenant that the tenant orally three more Was extended for the year. The alleged detainee was verbally consenting to the original tenancy in writing, therefore, it should have been neglected in the same manner and could not be extended verbally with any imagination. Was repulsed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE SHAH alias HEERA v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1540
• Mst. SABIRA SULTANA v. ASIF FIRDOUS 2011 YLR 1543
• Haji MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. Mst. NASEEM MAI 2011 CLC 1545
• ZAFAR IQBAL alias MALANGA v. State 2011 YLR 1547
• MUHAMMAD YAR v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1549
• Mst. SANA DAUD v. S.H.O. 2011 YLR 1549
• MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL TUFAIL v. State 2011 YLR 1550
• MUMRAIZ v. State 2011 YLR 1551

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

law websites from FR Kohat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes