Article 302/324/34 Confirmation of attempted murder and confession offenses The suspect reported the benefit of the suspect with a delay of about two and a half hours and a postmortem examination was conducted on the body of the deceased at the time of the post mortem. In this regard, the preliminary investigation, discussion and consultation with the complainant cannot be ruled out in this regard, prior to the FIR registration, in the circumstances both witnesses were residents of a za case. It was not far from the area where the incident took place, the complainant who confessed that his release had reached the scene of the incident. It took place approximately 7/8 hours. The presence of witnesses at the site of both incidents provided by the complaint, when suspected at the relevant time, did not affect their testimony, the legacy of the victim, who allegedly suffered firearm injury at the hands of the accused. ? And he was examined and released, after being an unnecessary driver, as the most important witness of the incident, the evidence has been withheld by the prosecution, against him in the Law of Criminal Procedure ) Can be prosecuted against legal proceedings. , 1984 ocular account was not consistent with medical evidence The prosecution's case was that the accused had fired on the victim with 30 bore pistols, but no crime was recovered on the spot, the weapon was recovered. There was no benefit to the prosecution, which was not even sent to the forensic science laboratory for expert opinion; the prosecution did not prove that it had substantiated the evidence that it involved murder / robbery. Med
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
