For the specific performance of the contract, Section 12 suits the plaintiffs for a specific performance of the contract to sell in connection with the disputed property that they paid Rs 250,000 cash in the presence of the witnesses and the plaintiff also sued Was. Declaration of Documents and Trial The Court dismissed the claims of the plaintiffs while dismissing the defendants' case by a strong decision on the appeals and order of the appellate court, the same arguments for the plaintiffs were dismissed. The courts ignored the local commission's report. It has been fully proved that the plaintiffs were occupying the disputed land. The validity record reveals that the defendants deposited money in the bank on 22 2 1992 while the sale agreement was implemented in 19 1993, the deposit made on the bank 22 22 1992 was in connection with the sale agreement. No jurisdiction, neither local commission report presented with evidence nor local commission was summoned as witnesses. Defendants made unreasonable stability decisions in any form of law, irregularity, illegal or jurisdictional error. Was unable to be identified and the revision request was dropped
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
