GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LAHORE versus AFTAB AHMED
Section 54 of the Law Amendment Ordinance (XII of 1972, 1972), a permanent injunction against the Su Suite as part or part of the Court of Appeal's commercial plaza, for widening the road and civil works by the plaintiffs in the disputed land. Was finished to complete. A single High Court judge in a grooming scheme concluded that the alleged breach case involved a factual dispute. The dispute of the jurisdiction of the court for the privilege of the land in the dispute should not be resolved on the basis of the evidence, such an inquiry can be made by the civil court in the pending proceedings between the parties and Was not to be decided. By the High Court, nor the authority to demolish a structured building, unless information about the question is reached, whether the authorities claim it is publicly owned and illegal As the plaintiffs have, the competent court had deemed it worthy. The interests of both parties were involved, it was important that it was said that the question was decided immediately following the trial of a permanent injunction under the court, the defendants claiming to be entitled to the disputed land. If this question was previously a pending dispute in Germany, determine the question, according to the law, on or before the target's date
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
