Section 302 (b) and 310 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Article Atlat Qutel Umid was compromised between the accused and the legal heirs, claiming that there was an agreement between him and the deceased's legal heirs, The father of the legal heir, who had relinquished his rights to the detainees and the detainees, was told after the affidavit that he was unmarried and that his mother and siblings were left behind, who made this statement under oath. That they have compromised. With the free consent of the accused and they had no objection to the fate of the accused, the mutual agreement would bring peace to society and the possibility of bloodshed in the future, was the divine wisdom behind the concept of pardon in Islamic jurisprudence. Based on the statements made by the Sessions Judge, the crime was properly reduced and the accused was acquitted and released.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
