Articles 514 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/34 of Kutal Im, the attempt to seize bail bonds was absent from the court at the last stage of the trial and the administration of the justice trial court. After being interrupted, all bail bail was confiscated, according to his bail that the accused was obliged to fulfill his promise to appear in court. However, despite the time allotted to them in this regard, they failed to do on the part of the applicants that they did not receive any financial benefit from the accused being guaranteed and seized the entire amount of the guarantees mentioned in the bail bonds. Was gone A rule and any kind of relaxation sought in it had to be particularly aggravating and the basis for its support should be proved before the court unless any kind of softening should be demonstrated by the court. ? Fetching the Bail Bond Amount Referring to the court in this regard should be dynamic and progressive and oriented, with the intention of discouraging the accused from jumping bail bonds. No grounds for showing any kind of flexibility in favor of the applicants were excluded.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
