Sections 302 (b) / 34 and 392/34, the definition of evidence of robbery, the benefit of the doubt was no direct evidence available in this case, which was primarily seen last time on the evidence and additional judicial confessions of the accused. Didn't believe it. The identity parade was not held in the presence of the witness and the magistrate in the last witnessed evidence of whether they could identify the accused, as per the law of the deceased, in the presence of the magistrate the admission of the identity of the accused through the parade , Attached to his identity in court, because of the availability of numerous possibilities to witness the witness during the investigation and the prosecution witness's testimony after the arrest of the accused more than eight and a half months after his arrest. I pointed out that there are many possibilities. To see them, last-minute evidence, therefore, did not encourage the reliance on the absence of tax evasion on any legal identity parade. i The car was not presented to the court, nor were the witnesses identified. No documents relating to the ownership of the said employee were produced during the investigation or trial, thus, the accused was not linked to the crime. With the pistol recovered from the accused, the recovery of the crime did not help the prosecution, but in the absence of direct evidence against them, two months later the additional prosecution of the accused to commit a criminal offense, There were no witnesses. Police did not immediately notify police of the aforementioned judicial confession, police delayed recording the witness statement in this regard nine days later.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
