Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Qatil Im Bell, the grant of further investigating suspect was not named in the FIR and it was for the first time by the complainant through his supplement in this case. I was involved. A statement made a year and ten months after the incident, evidence of two of the prosecution's witnesses under section 161 was recorded under the CCPC regarding the extra-judicial confession of the accused, no complaint in any of its history. No, the complainant mentioned the date of the additional judicial confession in his complaint, more than two years after the complainant's additional statement and the delay in connection with the accused's extra-judicial confession. The evidence brought the defendant under section 497 (2) to prosecute the accused for further investigation of his crime. The CCP suspect was admitted on bail in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
