Because of Section 2? (b) and 2Q murder, the reason for the disappearance of the evidence of the crime was the circumstances of the final evidence, the evidence of the recovery and the medical evidence; The suspect was seen, but he also spoke to them. Medical evidence confirmed the final evidence that the deceased's body was recovered from the house 200/300 yards away from where he was last seen with the accused. The evidence of the said prosecution witness could not be excluded simply because of his relationship with the deceased, as he had no enmity with the accused and his evidence The inward importance was due to the fact that the body of the deceased was recovered from his house. The suspect, identified on the evidence, had strong evidence linking the commission to the crime. The accused did not specify how the aforementioned deceased was buried in it, until the prosecution's witnesses suggested that the deceased's deceased was not recovered from his home on the suspect's identity. And the conviction of the offender was maintained under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
