MUHAMMAD ILYAS KHAN LODHI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Article 21 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition The petitioner's request for separation of the Ex parte's Execution Order was that the landlord and the tenant were not present between the parties. That no notice was issued in the prescribed format. The action server's denial notification was invalid. And that in the course of its execution, it was found out about the earlier order that the appellate court had upheld the rent tribunal order, under the affidavit notice issued to the tenant under Ovi, CPC, Neither facilitated nor filed copies of the leave application within 10 days. The withdrawal request and the documents were enclosed under which the notice issued to the tenant by the executor and the newspaper representative was neither in the prescribed form nor were copies of the withdrawal request, as well as other documents. ? He did not disclose that he approached the tenant at his shop and issued notices and the declaration shows that the tenant was not asked to file a leave application within 10 days under which the Punjab rented. No notice was taken in the prescribed form under Section 21 (1) of the Premises Act 2009. Served the tenant, therefore, cannot be prosecuted against the former parties, nor can the order of eviction be issued against him, granting the application for separation of the preceding injunction, the preceding injunction. Vacation leave may be granted in an application for separation of prayers and contest and will not require a separate application. Rent a rental tribunal
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
