Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 397/412 robbery or theft, death or serious injury, receiving theft of stolen property in the commission of a robbery bail, further investigation into the case Was an FIR grant. The accused, named after the delay of four days from the date of the incident, was not named in the FIR, but in the complainant's supplementary statement. When he was detained in the District Jail in another case, he was included in the investigation, the identity of the accused was not abandoned by the police nor did the complainant know of it nor at the time of his presence. He was identified as the accused The identity parade, allegedly being one of the accused, was allegedly related to the complicity of the accused, the matter being held that the accused's brother-in-law was also unnecessary to recover the affected money. Yes, there was no evidence on record to establish it. The recovered amount was part of the sale of the plundered maize accused, the accused had already been granted bail on the basis of the complainant's oath, accepting his innocence for the complainant and acquitting him Was demanded which was named in some other cases. By nature, it was devoid of power because the complainant failed to present an order of conviction. The accused involved in such crimes was behind bars for about six months, without any progress in the trial. There was no need for further investigation by the police, the accused could not be detained indefinitely and was also granted bail. , Conditions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
