Section 42 of the Qunun testimony (10 of 1984, 1984, 1984), Arts 117 and 120 Gifts, the plaintiff claims the cancellation of the ounce by two courts to prove the present findings of fact that her husband. Through a work registered in the year 1947, the suit gifted the land in favor of it. But the husband, who was the plaintiff in the case, said that he had verbally canceled the gift. The trial case was decided in favor of the plaintiff and the lower appellate court dismissed her husband's appeal. After the statement, there was no need for the plaintiff to go to the husband's shoulders to prove the facts of the gift to prove his cancellation but there was no evidence available on record that contained the scope of the review. In the car process, the High Court refused to interfere in the final investigation of the facts filed by the two courts in which N The caption was deleted. Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
