Section 2 (b) b Qatil Adham appreciated the evidence that eyewitnesses made their presence clear at the time of the incident.Ocular testimony was truthful and credible and was proved by the site plan and medical evidence. The fear of retaliation was that the free people were generally reluctant to discharge against the perpetrators of the crime, so that they and their families could be protected from any potential danger or hassle, the FIR immediately. Was registered, the defendant's false identity was not identified, as it was previously known, trusted and trusted for eyewitness testimony. Willer's evidence cannot be dismissed, therefore, the conviction of the accused was maintained, however, the motive established by the prosecution was not proven, the incident was in front of the accused's house, what happened immediately after the incident and The identity of what happened between the parties was not known at that time, the accused did not prove to be a fugitive, it did not clear any crime. The weapon of offense could not be proved in the presence, the death sentence of the accused was reduced to life imprisonment.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
