STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN versus JAVED IQBAL
Section 80 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O XVI, R1 Document Preparation Document Preparation The insurance tribunal accepted the application for recovery of the damages from the policy and the insurance corporation / appellant claimed that the application. The user hid the contents and obtained the fraudulent policies. The health facts of the assurances and that the tribunal erroneously rejected the request for additional witnesses. At one time the justification policies were abolished but they were resurrected to ensure that policies were in place at the time of death. The validation of the policies was resolved / resolved in favor of the applicants, which resulted in the Home Insurance Corporation not accepting allegations of material hiding by the applicant corporation, raising any complaint under CPVC through OXVI. Was stopped when his lawyer closed the evidence. Assuredly, there was no legal consequence of the policy after the issuance of the insurance and it could not be relied on that such a disease existed before the issuance of the insurance policy, after the insurance policy was obtained. Can't be blamed for not disclosing any disease. In order to assure the health of any material concealment, when the insurance policy was issued, the defamation order was not subject to any illegal action and the appeal of the High Court was dismissed in that case.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
