ALLIED BANK LTD. versus DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE)
Section 77 Punjab Finance Act (VI, 2010, 2010, 2010), Section (()) (b) Constitution of Pakistan, Arts petition 199 remedy and Constitution 23 Constitutional application effectively refuses the Registrar because the sale contract is hereby entered into. It has to be paid on the capital value tax 2. At the recorded cost of all the immovable property sold in the device, the lawyer for the Department believed that the constitutional application was not applicable as the applicant had the option of establishing a civil suit under section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908. Is the way. Registrar petitioner had already paid the capital value tax in addition to other taxes before the disputed order and he was entitled to settle the matter as soon as possible, delay in registration of property also damaged the applicant's basic right to property. That allows the applicant to use and enjoy his or her property. There was no clear reason for the reduction of capital value tax under Secto by the Registrar, subject to reasonable restrictions only. In the present case of N6 (4) (b) of the Punjab Finance Act, 2010, not all such factors were eligible to be filed under section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
