A. XXXVII, Rr 1 and 2 negotiable instruments Act (XXVI 1881), the suit was not only signed by the plaintiff in the report of the suit Perfuso Fingerprint Expert for the receipt of money on the basis of section 118 promissory note, as well as The thumb impression was also noted as a receipt but the trial court dismissed the case. The plaintiff's signatures may be disputed, but the fingerprint expert's signature in the fingerprints, along with the report's further dedication, accuracy and reliability, as well as the assumption attached to the promissory note under Section 118, the Conversation Tool Act, 1881 , The plaintiff was in favor of the trial The court did not properly appreciate the evidence of the parties under which the High Court was required to intervene in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the appellant. The verdict was given in favor.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
