PAKISTAN MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (PVT) LTD. THROUGH GENERAL MANAGE versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH SECRETARY INDUSTRIES, COMMERCE AND MINERAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, P
RR 1 (2), 15 and 93 of the North West Frontier Province Mining Concession Rules, 2005, RR 102 and 183 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Respondents to the Constitution of the Gypsum Mines forming part of the applicant's salt boxes. Grant of this lease to Request for Transfer from the Applicant to the Appeal Authority on the Application of Petition 1, 2000, on which the Mining Committee, on 31st 2001, ordered that the applicant's appeal be dismissed due to the unavailability of the area. Vendors' request may be time barred. This permission was granted to the defendant without consulting the defendant on the lease of the gypsum mine. Such lease was seizing the mining activities of the applicants for sale of stone in salt mine. And that he has no knowledge of improper leasing. Applicants request that he had no knowledge of unknown lease, as per his own representation, unknown lease was mentioned by 10 10 2005, therefore, the appeal filed on 12 4 2006 was banned. The mining committee did not consider "preferential rights" in favor of any individual. The pre-empted lease was granted under the order of 2000, 2000, therefore, the appellate authority while appealing the decision of the North West Frontier Province. Cannot apply R102. The Petitioner's appeal was filed after the Mining Constitution Rules, 2005 were not compiled and decided by the Appellate Authority following the statutory statement of the Rules, 2005, therefore, the procedure relating to its formulation, forum and appeal procedure. The provisions were applicable. The appellate authority could not be given the same effect as in 2005, when the applicant decided the appeal.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
