SHAHID FAROOQ versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Article 199 Termination of Civil Service Employee, who was employed by the contract based line superintendent Grade 1, was terminated as a junior engineer on the basis of specialized services in the department, consequently against him. The criminal case was filed and because he was dismissed from his job and no appeal was allowed for extension of the contract but the government was solely responsible for not extending the contract. Was involved in a criminal case filed against him, but the employee was acquitted. Without waiting for the outcome of the trial, the authorities approved the unclean verdict, the allegations of moral corruption should be properly investigated, investigated and should be proved after providing the opportunity for a hearing. A person may be found guilty on the basis of solid evidence after a proper investigation and after providing it. Without the proper procedures, the opportunity to listen to the article cannot be considered sufficient to find the person responsible for the litigation, no matter how strong it may be, depriving the employee of the opportunity to specify his / her position. Was removed, the employee-applicant's career-related stanza with the criminal case registration was removed. The competent court is related to the future of the employees with their verdict, but still with the unconstitutional order. Likewise the employees were regularized on the basis of the contract, but the employee / applicant was not regularized because they Suspended due to offender registration This
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
