The trial court dismissed the case from the jurisdiction of sections 10, 12, 14, 15 and 17 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), sections 9 and OXXI, RR 97 and 98 suits, but On appeal, the trial court set aside appeals, rulings and decrees and dismissed the case in favor of the plaintiffs, and pursuant to section 12 of the Mortuary Lands Act, 1964, Was given the authority to enforce and enforce the orders under Provided appeal and review treatment and authorized the collector to seize the sprinkler during execution as appropriate in the Civil Court under ORXS RR 97 and 98, CPC section of the Residential Lands Act, 1964 17 was banned from fitting and restoring restoration. The jurisdiction of the civil court appellate court went beyond its jurisdictional parameters described under the law, because when special treatment was available to the litigants under special law, it was referred to in section 9, CPC has the right to seek special tribunal or court jurisdiction, which was expressly prohibited by law from the sanction of a prohibited trial, in light of which the appellate court Had to see the verdict. He said that the provision of the law shows that the restriction of jurisdiction under the law was not valid, that the appellate court failed to disclose the original intent and purpose of the law and to apply the facts of the case in the same way. Is. Mortgage restored as mortgage paying mortgage under age 20
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
