Section 302 (b) and 449 define the evidence of murder and homicide in addition to the motivating community between the two defendants, the joint intent of the accused on the strength and evidence of the accused cannot be removed from each other. Was commonplace, but it was the culprit that he was convicted of, which was not possible. The alleged crime rifle tagged with the accused was not found to be in working condition and, after a serviceable inspection by a specialist, the matching of the blank could not be carried with the rifle under the circumstances because a test fire by the rifle in question. Could not be done Investigation of such incidents is severely reflective and it appears that the crime rifle was not recovered on the suspect's report, im empty cases and the crime weapon was not established when the crime was empty. Was found to be vacant, there was no support for the prosecution and the evidence was not of legal evidence or judicial utility. Depending on the testimony of the other witness, he had no legal status or reliability, since the witness was trivial because his intelligence could be manipulated as he liked. Whether such evidence can be safely obtained. The evidence of the complainant needs to be rejected because both he and his minor son were not denied. The testimony of the accused says that no evidence can be independently supported in the nature of the witnesses, even in the case of the accused, he could not be trusted. , Identify the culprits
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
