Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed appreciating the evidence, his presence on the occasion of the three witnesses of the prosecution, who were natural witnesses, was natural and there was no contradiction in their evidence and the timely FIR Was filed and was never used by the complainant. There was nothing in the record for advice and counsel to impose a false accusation on the accused that the witnesses had changed the real culprits, that one witness was not related to the accused and that his presence was proved on that occasion and he was the accused. Was identified as a straightforward statement that fully linked the suspect to the statements of the prosecution witnesses and was supported by other witnesses. Despite a lengthy inspection, the defense said that witnesses' testimony had failed to crush the evidence, medical evidence confirmed the molecular version of the forensic laboratory was positive and the stimulus also proved to be a daylight. There was no possibility of misidentification, and the complaining party had already known the accused, if anyone, according to the testimony, had to be neglected because by the trial, they were minor offenders on whom It was alleged that they did not need intervention. Was retained
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
