Section 2 302 / at34 Qatil's testimony of testimony benefited from the suspicion that the preliminary investigation was done before the FIR was filed, supported by the fact that the investigating officer had admitted that the FIR In addition to all the documents in his handwriting, the investigating officer could not present a plausible explanation for not writing the FIR on his own hand; the ocular account contradicted the medical evidence when he was not suffering from any weakness or disability. , There was no incident at that time, shown in the FIR, and not by the prosecutor Nada and the state prosecutor have been compiled by the lawyer because the co-accused was already convicted, so the accused's appeal will be dismissed, the law was not sustainable. A fresh trial against each of the accused, later surrendering and the Supreme Court was obliged to examine the evidence and apply its independent judicial mind. The co-accused's previous conviction was denied, if such a request was handled, then a fresh trial against the arrested accused would be just a strange case for defeating the principles of law and justice. In addition, two real brothers were also charged. A fugitive who belonged to the same family tragedy appeared to be an individual's job In addition to the unseen crime, the trap was thrown heavily due to the consultation and deliberations before the prosecution witness's registration. Syed's witness, who was from a distant place, appeared as a defense witness.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
