LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MARDAN versus MST. MUQESHA BEGUM
Sections 4, 12, 17, 18, 23 and 54 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 24 Land Acquisition Protection of Property Rights Determination of Compensation Amount Market Value of Land Acquired by the Referee Court, Acquisition Collector Rs. 1250 Marla , When the referee court raised Rs 5,000 in a single Marla, the Acquiring Authority sought to increase the market value of land acquired from the same validity landlord that the suit land was located on Main Road and surrounded by population. Was taken The Land Acquisition, by the Commercial Market Collector, failed to keep the suit property location, while determining the location of the acquired property, and the suit property was taken over in 1993, while the award was announced. Was done in 2002, about nine. For years after the acquisition, with no material in front of him, the collector paid and relied solely on the average average fair value of the property, with a fair and reasonable determination of the market value of the one-year average property property. Can the property owner be compelled to take part in his property, be paid a fair price, and be properly compensated by Article 24 of the Constitution for dealing with the mandatory acquisition of property by the state for public purposes? It was the responsibility of the state to pay only the legitimate and hence the increase in the amount of compensation From Rs 1250 to Rs 5000 per marla, the evidence available by the Land Acquisition Judge / Referee Judge was supported by the referee court, any illegal interference, irregularities or misrepresentation or evidence. Unable to read, the High Court n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
