For the specific performance of the contract to sell the plaintiffs for trial of sections 12 and 35, a case was filed in connection with the measure of 16 kanal, 10 marla area, but the trial court upheld the judgment of the case up to 5 kanal and 8 Marla Appeal Court amended this decree and added 9 Kanal. As the trial court ruled in the area 4 times and the plaintiff was directed to submit Rs. 75,000 to the court within a month's time, the plaintiff's petitioners filed a petition against the amendment. In which they demanded a deduction. CID revision request for consideration of sale of suit property was dismissed; the petitioner filed a petition with the appellate court seeking permission to deposit Rs. 75,000, which was filed by the Special Relief Act of 1877. Appellate Court's eligibility section 35 was dismissed. , Did not provide any result for not submitting the balance in the sales calculation, therefore, the appellate court made no mention of the good condition law in the immovable order dismissing the case for non-consideration of the sale of the balance The parties were to proceed in the matter of extension to submit the balance amount in this case. In the scope of the contract specific order was a preliminary decree of nature, not a final order and the court would not approve the decision. , The court will not stand on the decision which the court held on its decree and Day / That interpretation can assign an application by creditors to extend the time for filing balance. The plaintiffs comply with the order to collect the balance amount
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
