Find a Lawyer

TAJ ALI KHAN versus MOINULLAH KHAN

An attempt to compel Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 324/34 murder, was reported to the police about 15 minutes after the incident, and the delay was explained to the F.I. R was directly charged. The medical report stated that the injured complainant suffered injuries on the body part of the body. Ocular evidence also indicated that the parties were not the same in the alleged cross case. This fact cannot be ignored at the bail-out stage, unless otherwise every cross-case cannot be a cause for guarantee. Medical evidence supported the prosecution's case.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• DILARAM KHAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1732
• MUKHTAR AHMAD KHAN v. Dr. Syed SOHAIL ILTAF, SECRETARY HEALTH 2011 MLD 1738
• NOOR ULLAH v. JEHANGIR KHAN 2011 YLR 1746
• RAHIM GUL v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1769
• GAGGAN CATERING SERVICE v. BALANA RESTAURANT 2011 CLD 1774
• Syed ABRAR HUSSAIN SHAH v. State 2011 MLD 1781
• SARDAR ALI SHAH v. GHUFRAN ULLAH 2011 CLC 1787
• NADAR KHAN v. Mst. KAMIN TAJA 2011 MLD 1796

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

famous lower court advocate from Havelian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes