Section 42 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Section 17 Constitution Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Arts 17 and 79 Gifts, evidence of donor's unregistered effect The conclusions of the two courts below the plaintiff claimed that on the basis of The suit owns the property. The trial court and the lower appellate court essentially dismissed the lawsuit and the appeal in favor of the plaintiff over the immovable property of more than 100 people, but the gift letter in question was never submitted for registration and Nor was it presented to the revenue authorities to add the revenue to the record, as the explanation offered by the claimant in their submission was that they could not do so in order to be included in the registration or record of income due to financial weakness. But in the witness box, the plaintiff stated that such an explanation was not reliable. They have sued the recipient for putting the gift process into practice. The plaintiff contradicted his position at the Plaintiff in which it was alleged that he had approached the civil court for the required declaration in response to defendant's intervention and consequently after the property owners were killed. The relief suit was brought and during his lifetime the plaintiff did not take any explicit action to acknowledge the gift. After the death of the two alleged donors, their rights and lawsuit were filed, although the identity of the alleged donors did not have a card number or identification mark. It has a thumbprint on it. Send it for verification by the contestant. Can establish the reality of donor thumb impressions, with experts arguing for thumb prints with controversial thumb impression
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
