Sections 517 and 561 of the Control of Narcotic Materials Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (c), 32 and 33 of an alleged confiscation vehicle used for the purpose of canceling a confiscation order and applying Were charged with requesting the return of a medical treatment from the vehicle. They were acquitted of the charges, while the vehicle allegedly used in the commission of the crime was ordered to be retained by the trial court until the appeal / review period ends. And then dispose of it in accordance with the law. , Filed an application under CRPC. The trial court ceded the appeal as an appeal and was disposed of as the owner of the undercarriage vehicle; they were not put on notice by the trial court as the vehicle could not be confiscated because the prosecution also directed the owner during the investigation. Didn't bother to search. The aforementioned vehicle, through its registration number, filed an FIR in connection with the theft of a vehicle under Section 381A, PPC of the police, while supplying Control Section 32 of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 The vehicle was allowed to seize only when the owner knew that the crime was being committed or committed, in the present case, the trial court, without proper investigation, dismissed the application, the owner's drug substances. The unclean order was set aside without complying with sections 32 and 33 of the 1997 Act and the trial was given to the trial court so that Appellant / Vehicle as per
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
