Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RASHID versus STATE

Appreciation of Section 2 302 (b) Qatil-Amad evidence Although this was an unreasonable event, the prosecutor was able to prove his case against the accused by means of trust based on objective evidence, with no clear motive. Had made and described a voluntary confession. The whole story situation was first caused by poisoning in the form of poisonous rice and then by the wire of the pants, it led to his death as the accused was brutally and abhorrently abused. The crime was found, so the trial court pronounced the sentence. On the accused, will meet the pursuit of justice

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• AZIZ-UR-REHMAN v. QURBAN ALI 2011 CLC 477
• FAZAL ELLAHI v. AKHTAR ALI 2011 CLD 486
• GHADEER HAIDER v. State 2011 MLD 487
• MUHAMMAD RAHIM v. Malik DAUD KHAN 2011 CLC 490
• Miss RUKHSANA QURESHI v. PROVINCE OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary Planning Cell, Sports, Cultural, Tourism Archaeology and Mus 2011 PLC(CS) 495
• AKBAR KHAN v. ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN through President 2011 YLR 496
• AMIR ABDULLAH v. ZAFAR KHAN 2011 CLC 499
• MUHAMMAD KHALIL KHAN v. SALAH-UD-DIN 2011 CLD 504

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

list of advocates from Murree lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes