Sections 302 (b) and 84 of the convicted EM and the person with a brainless brain were accused of defining evidence that he was a leading schizophrenia patient. He was violent, aggressive and troubled in his conduct. And prison psychologists were consistently advised by several psychologists to keep her alone in the ward and the trial was suspended for a long time due to serious medical illness and her brain health, leading to this type of uncertainty. The sight can hardly be known of nature. There was no evidence on the record of the alleged act that, at the time of the incident, the accused was capable of understanding and distinguishing between right and wrong, in which case, the section was entitled to the exception of, the PPC incident occurred suddenly. There was no FIR witness in FIR, no witness name was mentioned in the FIR The possibility of a witness could not be ruled out, to save the skin of the jail staff. The medical evidence did not confirm the statement. Prosecutor's witness, who was the warden of the prisoner's piece of machete with which the suspect allegedly killed the victim, has reportedly been recovered, but has not been sent to forensic science for examination and expert opinion. The laboratory was accused of suffering from a serious psychiatric illness at the time of the accident, which was designated by the Standing Medical Board from time to time unpredictable and dangerous because of the nature of the suspect. Was unable to know. Movement; or that what he was doing was either wrong or profane to the law, to a certain extent such madness, holy
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
