MCB BANK LIMITED, PESHAWAR versus TILA FRONTIER FRUIT COMPANY
Appeal suits filed by the plaintiff bank were dismissed by the banking court on Articles 9, 10 and 22 of the suit for recovery of the debt. In the present case, the records of the account statement were denied and by the defendant / lender. It was denied that one day when the authenticity of the account and the accuracy of the statement were challenged, the bank needed to prove the entries and only the authenticated copies of the account statement would not be exposed to this entry. By proving the bank had brought the matter under consideration. Failing to prove the existence of a bank account in an unusual and careless manner, and even the existence of a debt, what to say about the account bank statements when the only case proved to be in his favor by proven and reliable evidence Proof of this is present on the bank. Usually before the court, the bank fails to exclude the one-way, before rejecting the plaintiff's claim, / the bank fails to prove its case through Corgent and R. Reliable evidence The trial court, in the circumstances, rightly dismissed the case, which was periodically barred, in the absence of a misrepresentation or failure to read the evidence, in an appeal by the High Court. The confused decision cannot be interfered with.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
