Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed praised the evidence In this report a case was filed by the injured complainant with all reasonable publicity which justifies the previous time between the injury and the death of the deceased. Will not be affected because the declaration of the deceased was an FIR, and the straightforward statement of events provided by the complainant FIR should, in the circumstances, be presented as a declaration of the deceased, as stated in the complaint The defendant's statement was confirmed by an independent source single-eyed witness, who was examined at length during which he was able to investigate the incident. I imagined. Eyewitnesses' statement was irrelevant and the accused failed to prove any wrongdoing or any wrongdoing on his part. His statement was trustworthy and could be safely acknowledged as a solid piece of evidence, which provides full evidence regarding medical as well as other circumstances, the testimony of the statement is straightforward and there is no contradiction in his statement. Or material contradiction was not found. The witness was lonely, but it can be believed, because there was no rule of law to produce the number of witnesses, the quality of wisdom was the standard and not the quantity, although the witness related to the victim said, but he added the accused. Had given a correct statement in doing so. The incident; he had no false intentions or false accusations against the accused and gave a permanent statement of the incident against the accused as the identity of the accused was easy as the FIR shows that the accused was the complainant. Already knew and there was no chance of misidentification. Without any compliments
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
