Find a Lawyer

SHAH ALAM KHAN versus STATE

The defendant's grant was not obtained by name in Section 497 of the Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Murder Umm Bell, FIR, but in spite of the fact the complainant's supplementary statement designated the second day of the hearing had gone. The previous enmity was leveled against the accused by the complainant, the prosecutor's case faced additional statements, no identification was dropped after the suspect's arrest, under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• TAHIR SHAH NAWAZ v. State 2011 MLD 1455
• SAADULLAH v. Mst. SARDAR BIBI 2011 PCrLJ 1455
• MUHAMMADI KHAN v. FAZAL MUHAMAMD 2011 YLR 1462
• MUHAMMAD IMRAN v. PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR 2011 PLC(CS) 1465
• MISAL KHAN v. MANAGING DIRECTOR CORPORATE MEMBER, KARACHI STOCK EXCHANGE 2011 CLC 1473
• TARIQ HABIB v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Chief Secretary, N.-W.F.P. 2011 PLC(CS) 1479
• HUSSAIN SHAH v. AKBAR SHAH 2011 YLR 1479
• RASHEED KHAN v. MISAL KHAN 2011 YLR 1488

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

ask a advocate free from Sidhnoti lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes