Find a Lawyer

HASNAIN FARAZ versus CHAIRMAN THROUGH B.I. S. E.

Section 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 115 of the Declaration for the Plaintiff requested the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education (Defendant) to amend its date of birth and the appeal court dismissed the appeal. Can't rule out the date of the plaintiff mentioned in the birth certificate, the plaintiff, who is a young college student, cannot be considered to have taken any advantage of this case to exploit anyone's loss. Has been established. If the High Court concludes with an unreasonable conclusion that such inquiries are misleading, fraudulent or arbitrary, the conclusions of the lower courts will result in severe abortion of justice and cannot be sustained. The courts below were set aside \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• Haji ABDULLAH JAN MARWAT v. Prof. BURHAN UD DIN 2011 PLD 246
• DILAWAR SHAH v. NASRULLAH KHAN 2011 PLD 256
• ZAFAR IQBAL v. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES through General Manager (Personnel) PIA, Karachi 2011 PLC(CS) 259
• MUHAMMAD TAJ v. State 2011 YLR 261
• Dr. SIKANDAR KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF KPK through Chief Secretary, Peshawar 2011 PLC(CS) 270
• RAHIM ULLAH v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE 2011 CLC 275
• NASRULLAH v. State 2011 PCrLJ 277
• ABDUL KHALIQ v. ATEEF-UR-REHMAN 2011 MLD 283

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

best advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes