Section 2 302 (b) Qatiel Ahmed sentenced to praise the evidence, no one to bring the accused to the accused, however, after more than four months, the victim's widow and younger daughter were examined. The investigating officer, who accused the two of them of having a notebook or hat, made a statement after explaining the matter that had suddenly flared up between the two brothers / accused and the victim due to the tragedy. Or could not collect anything. From the crime scene, the two women stated that they wept at their attitudes and by attracting neighbors to the location, to which the story was told, but the mother-pleading accused of raping the repeater shotgun. No one was exposed to the police as a weapon of crime, there was no money for recovery and discovery, for example the accused, nor did it say that the repeater shotgun inspected the weapon specialist or Was sent for the crime. The MPT was recovered from the stand and said that the statements of the two women who were filed more than four months after the rehabilitation were of little help, and that when the explanation given by them was halfway understandable, He had raised a reasonable doubt that he did not tell them the whole truth and deliberately suppressed the facts. The defense did not even come forward with a long truth to help the court reach a conclusion. Given that, it was more than likely. And this tragedy signified the fact that the deceased had committed some invasive activity, which led to a sudden, irresistible mood and intense outrage.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
