Article 2 302/324 / 427at / Q34 Qatil-e-Am, the morning of the murder and the attempt to commit mischief The testimony of the eyewitnesses provided full explanation and justification of their presence at the relevant time and also the presence of the complainant. Without a shadow, the deceased's wife was present at the time of the incident and the deceased's son was presented as a prosecution witness who fully explained the incident as a witness to the same facts. But the non-production of the wife of the deceased is unnecessary; this case will not have any adverse effect. Witnesses' prosecution was permanent, and no contradictions or contradictions were found that could disrupt their testimony or cause any reasonable suspicion of their presence on the spot. The ocular account provided by eyewitnesses was established without any doubt, the unaware pandemic of the accused spread over the years against the accused remains to be proved until the fugitive and other accomplices are acquitted. While waiting for that, my relationship with the defendant with the prosecution's witnesses was proved on the record as well, stating that the testimony of the witnesses could be ruled out with anecdotal and credible testimony. The merits of the accused will not have any direct impact on the merits of the case as the allegations of the acquitted accused were different and the trial court maintained the evidence available on the record evidence and the allegation was proved directly. Against the victim, the punishment given to the accused was in accordance with the law
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
