Sections 8 and 42 declare the preparation of revenue records based on the division of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), based on the division of the OI, R10 and O XIV, R1 into four new pits and cancel the occupied distribution removal. Mutta, who claims to have done so and produced good iency, claimed that in his section, the district court's testimony after the conclusion of the evidence by the parties as a witness was revealed by such court testimony that the plaintiff's shares The plaintiff was not admitted. Its name, rather than the name of the tenants, would not be in accordance with the appeal against the order passed in favor of the parties, as a result of the involvement of the parties required by the applicant in the appellate court. An appeal will be made to the Court of Appeal for the formation of an additional related matter. In the case of exclusion of appeals and the dismissal of both such appeals, the suit of the court by the other co-owner in a suit against another party in accordance with the suit in the suit suits the parties as well as several persons. Owned and all of them could benefit or be affected by the change in distribution when he voluntarily created a new case for the tenants after recording the evidence, when the new facts were brought on record. The trial court was obliged to legalize and distribute all the yarn land owners in Khata. Get ready to record revenues based on the relay, the trial court will be directed to modify their applications to the parties must implement the necessary stakeholders and new
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
