Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 382/324/148/149 Death, Injury or Prevention, Theft of Reading After the Qatil Ahmed bail was prepared, nothing was obtained from the grant of further investigation. Was. The accused was recovered from the two shopkeepers through a recovery memo to link him to the crime, but the recovery memo did not link the accused to the crime, as it did not reveal the alleged recovery. The property was stolen, both witnesses / shopkeepers examined under section 160, the CCP of the Judicial Magistrate stated that the accused had purchased some domestic articles and payment was made by the accused in such case. The statements did not reveal that the accused had allegedly snatched the complaining party. It was necessary to prosecute the parade, but it failed, but the trial could not have involved the accused in any other offender. The case had no basis for denying his bail, unless it was proved that he was a habitual offender, his case was not listed in the FIR and no evidence was needed to link the accused to the crime. Was unavailable and no dastardly material was recovered from his possession. The accused came under further investigation, was entitled to bail privileges, the accused was admitted at bail, under circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
