Section 302 (b) Definition of Nature Defending Evidence Defendant could not find any solid evidence in support of the allegations leveled against him, linking them to the Commission of Crime was one of the prosecution's witness cousins while the other was the realm of the accused. The brother was not only a relative, but also an opportunistic, uninteresting witness. The victim; and even though the complaining party and the accused were equal in number and according to their version, the suspect was unarmed, which happened at odd hours of the night, unseen. And no independent support was available to support the account. The prosecution failed to prove the alleged motive, but there was no evidence to prove that the alleged weapons recovered on the indictment of the accused were in this case. Was used during the period, such evidence was not sent to the forensic science laboratory, and the trial court was not justified in relying on the prudent evidence that the prosecution's evidence was untrue but was bad. The accused could not be considered as similar evidence. Against the accused, when their case was the same as that of the co-accused prosecution, they failed to establish the presence of both, beyond any reasonable doubt and on the witnesses of the incident, relying on the accusations of the capital being too unsafe. Was, after excluding the evidence of the testimony, various pieces of evidence of Wanda's alleged retrieval of evidence on the indictment of the accused, and medical evidence presented by the doctor, to convict the accused in the absence of solid evidence of self-evidence.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
