Find a Lawyer

AKRAM versus NAZAR ALI

Section 11, 115 and O VII, R 1 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 12 and 54 Declaration of Title and Order Prohibition Rejected by the Judge Judeta of the Plaintiff, the trial court upheld the principle of the Plaintiff Rejected on principle. The original case of litigation between the parties on the same subject was finally decided by which the plaintiff's contention was dismissed that he was the sole legal owner of the suit property, followed by section 11, CPC. Was targeted. Legal objection and so on can be considered and at any stage of the proceedings can be decided under section 115, the CPC filed by the plaintiffs was not defensible as the plaintiffs' case from section 11 Was affected.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011

• GHULAM RASOOL v. THE STATE through Police Station Sohbat Pur District Jaffarabad 2011 YLR 2768
• COLLECTOR,, CUSTOMS SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, QUETTA v. MANAN KHAN, KARACHI 2011 PTD 2778
• Malik JAFFAR v. State 2011 YLR 2807
• SHAH NAWAZ v. State 2011 YLR 2843
• GHULAM AHMED v. MUZAFARA BEGUM 2011 YLR 2991
• ALI MUHAMMAD alias BABOO v. State 2011 YLR 3055
• PAKISTAN PETROLEUM LTD. v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL MINES AND MINERALS MINES AND MANPOWER BUILDING 2011 PLD 1
• ABDUL HAMEED v. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE 2011 PLD 11

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2011 →

solicitors from Haveli Kahuta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes