LASBELLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HUB versus PRISM PRINTER (PVT.) LTD.
Sections 2 (c), 2 (h), 24, 36 and 54c Electricity Rules, 1937, Supply Terms, Conditions, 19 and 25 Specific Relief Act (in 1877), Sections 42 and 54 Electricity Charge Dispute, Resolution Claimant The plaintiff's jurisdiction was upset by the defendant's connection to the power connection due to non-payment of power charges. Therefore, there was a relationship between licensees and consumers between the parties, therefore, the dispute arose. In connection with the electrical charges, the Electricity Act, according to the plaintiff of 1910, was to be sent to the Inspector of Electricity, the plaintiff admitted that the electricity charges were paid by him but A notice of discontinuance with respect to non-payment of dues was issued within the notice issued by the claimant. The provisions contained in section 24 of the Electricity Act, 1910, meant the dispatch to the Inspector of Electricity appointed under section 36 of the L. Electricity charges bills were issued in accordance with the Supply Terms 19 of the Electricity Act, 1910, as per the Electricity Rules, 1937, while Supply No 25 provided a mechanism for resolving disputes between departments and consumers. What. There was a restriction on the jurisdiction of the civil court, as listed in section 54C of the Electricity Act, 1910, with the trial court issuing the certificate of objection to the determination of the charge of electricity and the relief of its payment. Was not limited to. Restoration and maintenance of power supply based on payment and liability clearance, so relief is not received until the matter has been decided by the relevant authority under the relevant law and rules unless the lower appellate court. As well as the trial court
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
