Section 494 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Articles 409/420/467/468 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section (2) Criminal breach of trust by public servants, fraud, fraud, corruption The accused did not endorse any allegations of misconduct by any of the witnesses charged with the discharge of the prosecution; on the contrary, the information presented by the prosecutor supported the accused. It appears that whatever money was allocated to him, was properly spent, which is available on evidence, sufficient to establish contact with the accused. Was not. The commission of the alleged crime was even requested by the prosecutor to the trial court, dismissing such request without giving any reason, by requesting the court to withdraw the case against the accused. PC authorizes government lawyer to withdraw case: Insufficient evidence court had the power to monitor that it can be said that power cannot be denied or used by any authority. The public interest court will have to satisfy itself about the application for withdrawal stating the reasons for the approval or rejection of the appeal, for the purpose of allowing or denying the application for withdrawal and assigning reasons. No need to record evidence and such discretion. Can also be used on the basis of the material available on the record, the prosecution was unable to prove its case against the accused nor was the trial court not only unable to properly interpret the evidence, but also
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
