Find a Lawyer

AXLEPRODUCTS LIMITED versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD.

Articles 9 and 12 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 25 and 185 (3) applying for the ex-party decree have affected the defendant's service by publishing in the defendant's press that his No personal services were affected by the source. Bailiff or registered post or courier; and this was affixed to the summons address, where the defendant's office was prevented from excluding such application in which the banking court appealed to the financial institutions through the High Court. The appeal of the Ordinance 2001 was reaffirmed by the revision of section 9 (financial data). In order to serve the summons simultaneously by varying all the ways in the CPC, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal to be considered whether alternative services would be justified without resorting to other methods. no. And that a reasonable basis for providing a special way for litigation in banking matters can be justified on the basis of classification and whether this principle can be extended to Section 9 of the Financial Institutions (Financial Recovery) Ordinance 2001 Is only related to the service of the summons. General Chat Chat Lounge n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• RASHID AHMED v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, GEPCO 2011 SCMR 1451
• MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. SULTAN MAHMOOD 2011 SCMR 1453
• Mst. JANNAT BIBI v. SARAS KHAN 2011 SCMR 1460
• MUHAMMAD JAVED v. State 2011 SCMR 1462
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. State 2011 SCMR 1471
• NAZEER AHMAD v. GEHNE KHAN 2011 SCMR 1473
• MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. v. MUHAMMAD SHAHID MUMTAZ 2011 SCMR 1475
• ALLAH DITTA v. AIMNA BIBI 2011 SCMR 1483

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

registration advocate from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes