MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. versus MUHAMMAD SHAHID MUMTAZ
Section 2 (xxviii) and 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Sections 2 (h) (i) and 12 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Service Officer Grade. Dismissal II, the bank complaint application designated as the branch manager of the bank charge for misappropriation of money deposited by the consumer, determined by the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (whether he was a worker or not). The Ordinance (Ordinance, 1968) should be under the provisions of the Bank, long before the present case, had implemented the power of attorney in favor of the respondents. It cannot be doubted as to the authenticity of a Power of Attorney, with all the administrative authority and powers of its branch, which was signed by the President of the Bank. The notice by the public powers that the amendment and the powers involved in such powers are governed by the two Vice Presidents shows that the nature of the duties and functions of the defendant is administrative and supervisory and that the transfer of the plaintiff to an administrator after the present event. Did not manage. In order to facilitate the inquiry, the respondents' position was relevant at that time to determine their procedure for referring to the Labor Court as the bank's Branch Manager. To put the burden on the bank to make the mistake of the law was that the defendant was not a labor court. There was no jurisdiction to hear the respondents' complaint request. The Supreme Court set aside the unclean decisions of the courts below and dismissed the complaint in the circumstances.
